by lemons » Fri May 04, 2012 12:59 am
I'm so glad to hear that you are feeling better and that your BP is back to your normal. And I hope that you had nothing but good news at your appointment yesterday!
As for what to consider a "normal" rise in BP in the 3rd Trimester- the graph I mentioned below is clearly from an older paper since it doesn't show some information that is considered mandatory by today's standards, specifically it doesn't show any kind of analysis of standard deviations or other error. It is possible that the error analysis was conveyed in the text of the original 1976 paper. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the original so I don't know for sure. So, why am I telling you this??
The graph shows the average systolic and diastolic BPs of over 6,000 pregnant women over the course of their pregnancies. Since we are looking at all of the women combined, we don't know what the lowest BP was, only what the average was. Nor do we know what the highest BP was. Since we don't know these numbers, we can't get a good idea of what the range of BPs was for the study group. And the range would be much better at helping us decide what is considered "normal". (The error analysis that I mentioned above would help answer these questions by providing some information on the range of BPs). Even better would be to know what the absolute increase in BP was for individuals in the study group (ie Patient A's BP started at 110/65, decreased to a low of 100/60 at 20 weeks, and then increased to 115/68 at delivery). I hope this makes sense.
But yes, I think that the graph suggests that a slow, sustained rise in systolic BP of 5-7 mm Hg from 22 weeks gestation until delivery at 40 weeks should be considered average. But how much further can it rise and still be considered within a "normal" range? This graph doesn't provide that information. BUT, taking into account the old diagnostic criteria for PE (a rise of 30 mm Hg or greater in systolic pressure), my non-medical guess is that a 10-15 mm Hg increase in systolic BP (which should be noted by a physician) is probably within that normal range. I may have to track the original paper down to see if there is any more information... And if anyone else has any input as to what is considered normal, I would love to know.
But hopefully you will not have any more reason to worry about your BP between now and June 5th! Best of luck to you and baby! And let me know if any of this didn't make sense or if you have any other questions.
I'm so glad to hear that you are feeling better and that your BP is back to your normal. And I hope that you had nothing but good news at your appointment yesterday!
As for what to consider a "normal" rise in BP in the 3rd Trimester- the graph I mentioned below is clearly from an older paper since it doesn't show some information that is considered mandatory by today's standards, specifically it doesn't show any kind of analysis of standard deviations or other error. It is possible that the error analysis was conveyed in the text of the original 1976 paper. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the original so I don't know for sure. So, why am I telling you this??
The graph shows the average systolic and diastolic BPs of over 6,000 pregnant women over the course of their pregnancies. Since we are looking at all of the women combined, we don't know what the lowest BP was, only what the average was. Nor do we know what the highest BP was. Since we don't know these numbers, we can't get a good idea of what the range of BPs was for the study group. And the range would be much better at helping us decide what is considered "normal". (The error analysis that I mentioned above would help answer these questions by providing some information on the range of BPs). Even better would be to know what the absolute increase in BP was for individuals in the study group (ie Patient A's BP started at 110/65, decreased to a low of 100/60 at 20 weeks, and then increased to 115/68 at delivery). I hope this makes sense.
But yes, I think that the graph suggests that a slow, sustained rise in systolic BP of 5-7 mm Hg from 22 weeks gestation until delivery at 40 weeks should be considered average. But how much further can it rise and still be considered within a "normal" range? This graph doesn't provide that information. BUT, taking into account the old diagnostic criteria for PE (a rise of 30 mm Hg or greater in systolic pressure), my non-medical guess is that a 10-15 mm Hg increase in systolic BP (which should be noted by a physician) is probably within that normal range. I may have to track the original paper down to see if there is any more information... And if anyone else has any input as to what is considered normal, I would love to know.
But hopefully you will not have any more reason to worry about your BP between now and June 5th! Best of luck to you and baby! And let me know if any of this didn't make sense or if you have any other questions.