by eleni » Thu Dec 02, 2004 11:41 am
No complaints about the info, nor the broad coverage. Note that this was actually published first in the NY Times and has been picked up by NY Times syndicates like the Minneapolis paper. The only downside is it is rather dry (no patients, no expert quotes) and doesn't mention the PF.
No complaints about the info, nor the broad coverage. Note that this was actually published first in the NY Times and has been picked up by NY Times syndicates like the Minneapolis paper. The only downside is it is rather dry (no patients, no expert quotes) and doesn't mention the PF.