I have been thinking about my antenatal checks at the first hospital, and wonder if they should have taken more care. As briefly as possible....I have pcos, high bmi, father had type II diabetes, mother has high bp, and Im 40yrs old, it was my first pregnancy. I had 1 in 29 risk of Downs syndrome (Trisomy 21), I developed gestational diabetes around 20wks and was on insulin from 23wks. My bp from the start was 140/90. By 26 wks I had only put on 4lb in weight. Had a scan at 24wks because they wanted to check on size of baby due to diabetes. Fundal height was measured 24/25/26 wks. At the 26wk check (my last before I transferred) I was told everything was 'normal' and there was no need for them to pass any info on to the new hospital.
At 26+4 I registered with new dr, bp was 185/125, 4+ protein. Admitted to hosp and Ellie was delivered at 27wks due to IUGR and pre eclampsia.
As time goes on I think a lot about things that happened (we lost Ellie when she was 27days old). Surely I was pretty high risk from the start? I can't understand why my bp was not more of a concern, and why nobody noticed that Ellie hadnt grown from 24wk scan to 26wk check. She was actually born at 580g having been estimated at 24wk scan and 27wk scan at 650g.
Maybe these are silly questions....but its bugging me right now.
Thanks for listening, hope somebody has some answers!
Sue
