by expert on call (297 Posts), Tue Oct 26, 2004 08:37 am
This lady certainly can attempt pregnancy again but might preferentially be cared for by a Ã¢â‚¬Å“high-riskÃ¢â‚¬Â obstetric specialist (MFM subspecialist). In this respect it would be of interest to know if this was the patientÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s first completed pregnancy, as well as more information on her at his time. This includes her actual blood pressure and renal test results today.
In general twin pregnancies have about a 25% of being complicated by preeclampsia, but follow the general dictum that preeclampsia in first pregnancy is unlikely to reoccur. On the other hand preeclampsia in a women who had previous pregnancies (multiparas) and who had early preeclampsia (<36wk) are more likely to have hypertension or recurrent preeclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy. At worst, however, the recurrence rate approaches 30%, meaning most succeed. More important no one can predict if the complication in the succeeding pregnancy will be mild and easily manageable, or come early and be severe enough to have to terminate the pregnancy. Thus, if this individual wishes to conceive again she need not be discouraged.
Expert on Call
Information provided on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disorder, or prescribing any medication. The Preeclampsia Foundation presents all data as is, without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, and is not liable for its accuracy, for mistakes or omissions of any kind, nor for any loss or damage caused by a user's reliance on information obtained on the site. Professional opinions on this condition vary greatly. The Preeclampsia Foundation endorses no one course of treatment or "cure". Responses generated by our Experts to specific questions are based on information anonymously submitted to this site via email, are not based on a complete review of any patientÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s medical records and should not be construed as the only reasonable expert response to the info submitted and/or the scenario described.