UtARI did not vary significantly between the three groups (0.73, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively). Women in Group 1 had a significantly higher prevalence of uterine artery notching than those in Group 2 (73 vs 57%, p=0.04). In Group 1, the UtARI and prevalence of notching was not significantly increased when pregnancies were subsequently complicated by pre-eclampsia (p=0.60 and 0.61, respectively). However, in 12 pregnancies requiring delivery before 37 weeks due to pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, abruption or intrauterine fetal death, the UtARI was significantly higher than in the 44 pregnancies with normal outcome (p=0.04). A combination of UtARI and notching showed sensitivities up to 75% and negative predictive values up to 88% for adverse outcome before 37 weeks...
So, a bad uterine artery doppler doesn't always pick out women who are going to go on to develop preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies, although a *really* bad one seems to be related pretty well.
Information provided on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disorder, or prescribing any medication. The Preeclampsia Foundation presents all data as is, without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, and is not liable for its accuracy, for mistakes or omissions of any kind, nor for any loss or damage caused by a user's reliance on information obtained on the site. Professional opinions on this condition vary greatly. The Preeclampsia Foundation endorses no one course of treatment or "cure".
The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests