Placental vascular lesion differences in PIH/IUGR

The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.
User avatar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 10203
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 06:36 am

Placental vascular lesion differences in PIH/IUGR

Postby caryn » Sat May 08, 2010 04:53 pm

Maternal vascular lesions were more common in the PIH group and combined group (61% and 59%, respectively), compared with the FGR group (16.2%; P < .001), and villous lesions were more common in the combined group, compared with the FGR and PIH groups (79.5%, 53.5%, and 46.9%, respectively; P = .004). Fetal villous changes were observed in 16.2% in the FGR group, compared with 3.1% in the PIH group (P = .03), and chronic villitis was 15.2% in the FGR group vs 1.6% in the PIH group (P = .004).

So this isn't really something they can use for diagnosis, but after the fact. When they check the placenta in pathology, PE placentas turn out to be broken in a different way from IUGR placentas. The damaged areas are damaged in a different way. (I quoted the statistics bit because the p-values are pretty sweet -- this is definitely statistically significant.)

Information provided on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disorder, or prescribing any medication. The Preeclampsia Foundation presents all data as is, without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, and is not liable for its accuracy, for mistakes or omissions of any kind, nor for any loss or damage caused by a user's reliance on information obtained on the site. Professional opinions on this condition vary greatly. The Preeclampsia Foundation endorses no one course of treatment or "cure".

Return to “Announcements and Preeclampsia in the News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests