Post Reply FAQ Members Login

Analyzing the Nutritional Hypothesis

The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.

Analyzing the Nutritional Hypothesis

Postby caryn » Sat Mar 03, 2012 06:14 pm

by caryn (10131 Posts), Sat Mar 03, 2012 06:14 pm

Such considerations may lead one to speculate that certain diets may prevent or reverse the disease, in which case the appropriate diet becomes a therapeutic intervention. However the best research to date suggests this just isn't so.

http://www.preeclampsia.org/component/l ... hypothesis

Come comment on the blog - we want to get more visibility! :D
Science! The articles you don't want to miss:
The Preeclampsia Puzzle (New Yorker) and Silent Struggle: A New Theory of Pregnancy (New York Times)
Looking for recent articles and studies? Lectures from researchers?
A chance to participate in research? For us on Facebook or Twitter?

Caryn, @carynjrogers, who is not a doctor and who talks about science stuff *way* too much
DS Oscar born by emergent C-section at 34 weeks for fetal indicators, due to severe PE
DD Bridget born by C-section after water broke at 39 weeks after a healthy pregnancy
User avatar
caryn
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10131
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 06:36 am

Return to Announcements and Preeclampsia in the News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest