three distinct molecular subclasses of human preeclampsia

The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.
User avatar
caryn
Forum Moderator
Posts: 10203
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 06:36 am

Re: three distinct molecular subclasses of human preeclampsi

Postby caryn » Thu Mar 19, 2015 04:03 pm

I'm pulling the full-text of this paper next, which looks similar: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25766966
Science! The articles you don't want to miss:
The Preeclampsia Puzzle (New Yorker) and Silent Struggle: A New Theory of Pregnancy (New York Times)
Looking for recent articles and studies?
A chance to participate in research? For us on Facebook or Twitter?

Caryn, @carynjrogers, who is not a doctor and who talks about science stuff *way* too much
DS Oscar born by emergent C-section at 34 weeks for fetal indicators, due to severe PE
DD Bridget born by C-section after water broke at 39 weeks after a healthy pregnancy

User avatar
caryn
Forum Moderator
Posts: 10203
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 06:36 am

three distinct molecular subclasses of human preeclampsia

Postby caryn » Thu Mar 19, 2015 03:55 pm

"Unsupervised clustering of these patient samples revealed three distinct molecular subclasses of PE. This included a "canonical" PE subclass demonstrating elevated expression of known PE markers and genes associated with poor oxygenation and increased secretion, as well as two other subclasses potentially representing a poor maternal response to pregnancy and an immunological presentation of preeclampsia."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679511

So for just about forever, they've said this syndrome was "multifactorial" - many different things can cause it. This study into the underlying genetics isolated three broad categories of suck that can predispose a pregnancy to preeclampsia. One was of a set of genes we understand pretty well at this point - poor oxygenation of the placenta leading to unregulated soluble flt, vascular damage, and all the other things that fit into a classical preeclampsia profile - and the other two were "molecular clusters", or sets of genes that tended to appear in the analysis next to one another, but which we don't always understand well yet. (There has been a lot more work on the first group in pregnancy than on the second two.) Those were "poor maternal response" - probably underlying conditions like kidney disease that cause slightly different downstream effects from the preeclampsia driven by shallow implantation - and "immunological presentation" - which is HELLP, and probably women with genetic conflict with the partner that compromises their ability to host a fetus (think women whose babies are a good size, and who have no obvious underlying conditions, but who develop severe rapid-onset disease with no warning.)
Science! The articles you don't want to miss:
The Preeclampsia Puzzle (New Yorker) and Silent Struggle: A New Theory of Pregnancy (New York Times)
Looking for recent articles and studies?
A chance to participate in research? For us on Facebook or Twitter?

Caryn, @carynjrogers, who is not a doctor and who talks about science stuff *way* too much
DS Oscar born by emergent C-section at 34 weeks for fetal indicators, due to severe PE
DD Bridget born by C-section after water broke at 39 weeks after a healthy pregnancy


Return to “Announcements and Preeclampsia in the News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests