by angieb » Sun Feb 27, 2011 09:53 pm
Chemical pregnancy and miscarriage are technically the same thing, although chemical pregnancy is considered a very early miscarriage. Basically, the egg would have been fertilized and formed into an embryo or whatever the technical term is for after egg and sperm meet (maybe a zygote or blastocyst, I forget), but it won't implant in the uterine lining for whatever reason, so that person was sort of pregnant but never knew it and would never get a positive pregnancy test. (Basically, it's the same as a woman doing IVF having an embryo or two transferred into her uterus, but if she doesn't get pregnant, it's not really a miscarriage and not really a chemical pregnancy, it's just the embryos failed to implant, but there were embryos, so some people would consider that a pregnancy.) After the initial implantation has occurred, HCG will be produced and you'll get a positive test. Implantation is actually a process that takes several weeks, which is why I say "initial" implantation. I guess most doctors agree that low dose aspirin shouldn't interfere at that point, as most say to start it with a positive test (which means embryo should be implanted into the uterine lining if someone is getting a + test.) And in fact, some doctors prescribe low dose aspirin to women with a history of recurrent miscarriages even with no clotting disorders (I think usually after a positive test but I'm not totally sure.)
Me (29) DH (30)
#1-Olivia Caetlyn-9-28-09-9-28-09, 23+2 wks, emergency classic c-section, class I HELLP, IUGR
#2- Lucas Oliver (rainbow baby)- April 2011, 36+2 wks, HELLP and pre-e free! (lovenox and LDA pregnancy)
#3-Matthew, late October 2012...mostly normal, 37 wks, (lovenox and LDA again)
My blog:
http://www.butterflies-and-rainbows.blogspot.com/