Locked FAQ Members Login

should I even consider transferring two blastocyst

Do you have a burning question you just have to ask our Medical Board Experts about hypertensive pregnancies? Please email your question to expert@preeclampsia.org Keep in mind, however, that we won't be able to answer every question and our docs can't offer medical advice and won't be able to comment on specific medical cases.

should I even consider transferring two blastocyst

Postby expert@preeclampsia.org » Thu Mar 15, 2007 01:44 pm

by expert@preeclampsia.org (322 Posts), Thu Mar 15, 2007 01:44 pm

Hello,

I am 43 years old and have been hypertensive since age 30. I have never been pregnant with a long history of severe endometriosis and infertility. I am 5'6" and 140 pounds and otherwise healthy. My BP had been controlled on 1mg of doxazosin and 100 mg of Toprol XL. In preparation for an April DE IVF cycle,my BP med has been switched to labetalol 200mg twice a day.I have been advised that I am at a very high risk for preeclampsia.

I would like to transfer 2 blastocysts in order to have the greatest chance for pregnancy. If I did become pregnant with twins, I believe it would be very difficult for me to consider reduction. Should I not even consider transferring 2 embryos? Would a twin pregnancy be out of the question for me? Can you advise me of how great my risk for PE is and how much a twin pregnancy would complicate matters?Thank you very much.
expert@preeclampsia.org
Registered User
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 02:46 am

Re : should I even consider transferring two blastocyst

Postby expert@preeclampsia.org » Thu Mar 15, 2007 01:46 pm

by expert@preeclampsia.org (322 Posts), Thu Mar 15, 2007 01:46 pm

I really can not answer this one because of my unfamiliarity with IVF and other assisted reproduction techniques, and their complication rate. This patient is already at considerable risk for preeclampsia as her hypertension has been present over 5 years, and yes a twin pregnancy and perhaps a modestly elevated body mass index will increase the risk further. There is no indication of whether the patient has any degree of end-organ damage especially cardiac performance, the latter mentioned because cardiac output which increases in pregnancy increases more with twins. In essence all risks, preeclampsia, and coronary events are elevated here, and increase somewhat with twin pregnancy.

Again, no real data here, but a “guestimate” of 40-50% preeclampsia rate is in order, with higher likelihood that any superimposed preeclampsia will be a more severe disease. Still if motherhood is strongly desired and fetal maternal medicine as well as internist support is good the pregnancy can succeed, and while I would prefer reduction, the patient must at least be ready to follow termination advice quickly. In summary: Opinions here are guesses without too much data.
expert@preeclampsia.org
Registered User
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 02:46 am


Return to Ask the Experts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest